<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Nokia E66 Offers</title> <atom:link href="http://www.zwee.com/mobile-phones/nokia-mobile-phones/nokia-e66-review-and-offers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.zwee.com/mobile-phones/nokia-mobile-phones/nokia-e66-review-and-offers/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=nokia-e66-review-and-offers</link> <description>zwee offers consumer reviews of gadgets and electronics. Rather than a sterile comparison shopping engine, we believe that accurate reviews by REAL consumers with real life experience of the products (New, used OR refurbished in good condition) will help you make better buying decisions.</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 00:04:51 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: marcell</title><link>http://www.zwee.com/mobile-phones/nokia-mobile-phones/nokia-e66-review-and-offers/#comment-358</link> <dc:creator>marcell</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 11:14:49 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zwee.com/?p=455#comment-358</guid> <description>I went with the E66 because I&#039;m not a hard texter and i didn&#039;t want a qwerty keyboard phone, the regular keypad is just enough for me. It&#039;s a great little smartphone, stylish and sleek and it has some great features like Wifi, Bluetooth, infrared, accelerometer sensor, gps, camera and many more. I must say that the camera quality is pretty poor, especially in low light conditions. But other than this overall it is a great phone. The build quality is excellent, I relly abuse the phone and after 5 months it still looks like new. It would be great to have a touch screen and a 3.5mm jack instead of the 2.5mm it has. I like the mp3/wma player very much, it&#039;s implemented really good. I found the battery life pretty good. The build quality and the finish is great although it gets dirty by finger prints easily.Overall I&#039;m impressed with this smartphone, the size and the easy of use makes it perfect for me.Pros: looks, build qualityCons: poor camera, catches fingerprints</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I went with the E66 because I&#8217;m not a hard texter and i didn&#8217;t want a qwerty keyboard phone, the regular keypad is just enough for me. It&#8217;s a great little smartphone, stylish and sleek and it has some great features like Wifi, Bluetooth, infrared, accelerometer sensor, gps, camera and many more. I must say that the camera quality is pretty poor, especially in low light conditions. But other than this overall it is a great phone. The build quality is excellent, I relly abuse the phone and after 5 months it still looks like new. It would be great to have a touch screen and a 3.5mm jack instead of the 2.5mm it has. I like the mp3/wma player very much, it&#8217;s implemented really good. I found the battery life pretty good. The build quality and the finish is great although it gets dirty by finger prints easily.</p><p>Overall I&#8217;m impressed with this smartphone, the size and the easy of use makes it perfect for me.</p><p>Pros:<br /> looks, build quality</p><p>Cons:<br /> poor camera, catches fingerprints</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Greg</title><link>http://www.zwee.com/mobile-phones/nokia-mobile-phones/nokia-e66-review-and-offers/#comment-357</link> <dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 11:13:56 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zwee.com/?p=455#comment-357</guid> <description>I wanted either a Sony Ericsson or a Nokia and after a few weeks of research and playing with the phones, I decided on the E66. The grey model looks fantastic, I&#039;m amazed with the features. It can handle MS Office docs, PDFs, it can easily connect via BlueTooth with other BT devices, it has built in GPS... The signal reception is strong. The phone is quite fast, launching applications only takes a second or less. It has enough memory for everything I need. The 3.2MP camera is ok for a phone, the image quality is average and the video is surprisingly good. The only  problem is that the shutter lag is quite noticeable. The music player is good - can work with playlists and there is equalizer function also. The screen autorotation is a very cool feature.The E66 is a very attractive phone, the stainless steel finish looks awesome and the build quality is excellent. Nobody can go wrong buying this phone, i would highly recommend it.Pros: design, finish, featuresCons: slow camera shutter</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wanted either a Sony Ericsson or a Nokia and after a few weeks of research and playing with the phones, I decided on the E66. The grey model looks fantastic, I&#8217;m amazed with the features. It can handle MS Office docs, PDFs, it can easily connect via BlueTooth with other BT devices, it has built in GPS&#8230; The signal reception is strong. The phone is quite fast, launching applications only takes a second or less. It has enough memory for everything I need. The 3.2MP camera is ok for a phone, the image quality is average and the video is surprisingly good. The only  problem is that the shutter lag is quite noticeable. The music player is good &#8211; can work with playlists and there is equalizer function also. The screen autorotation is a very cool feature.</p><p>The E66 is a very attractive phone, the stainless steel finish looks awesome and the build quality is excellent. Nobody can go wrong buying this phone, i would highly recommend it.</p><p>Pros:<br /> design, finish, features</p><p>Cons:<br /> slow camera shutter</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Database Caching 13/24 queries in 0.082 seconds using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: S3: zwee1.s3.amazonaws.com

Served from: www.zwee.com @ 2012-02-10 13:38:30 -->
